Against the backdrop of the previous 2 interludes (addressing various aspects of the present-day consumer orientation towards media), I would now like to return to the issue of how to promote more participation in communities such as those engaged with the WordPress platform. As I noted in ”Inviting, Welcoming, Promoting More Participation”, the vast majority of the community interacting with the WordPress platform does so in a primarily disengaged manner, and the 2 interveneing interludes have underscored the consumer orientation towards ”free offer” mentality which hardly involves any participation, engagement, involvement, let alone ownership in the WordPress medium / platform.
widespread aloofness and disengagement is – in my humble opinion – mainly
attributable to a lack of economic motivations, but in part also due to a very
narrow, limited self-centeredness throughout most civilizations today. People
are generally unaware of how their own actions impact their environments – the
most obvious case of this is probably the ”global warming” problem.
groundwork for the economic disenfranchisement of the vast majority of the
world’s population happened about 15 years ago, when Google decided to
disregard (and/or ”completely devalue”) all comments made on the Internet (this
came to be known as the ”nofollow” algorithm, and has since then been expanded
to many media platforms, perhaps most significantly websites like Facebook and
YouTube). Note that at the time Google made this decision, its repercussions
were not widely understood (and indeed many people actually applauded this as a
way to censor spam). In other words: it is not alone Google’s ”fault”, it was
the widespread adoption (of ”nofollow”) among publishers that drove these nails
into the coffin of community engagement.
Within a few years, all of the awe-inspiring widespread community engagement of early web-communities such as Digg had all but completely vanished. Today, the vast majority of websites are barren wastelands when it comes to user participation. The very few and very far between exceptions of so-called ”user-generated content (UGC)” firstly substantiate the rule, and secondly are of extremely dubious nature – since most of this content is outright pirated or in some other way fraudulent (e.g. ”fake news”).
that apart from hoodlums selling suckers vast varieties of ”get rich quick”
schemes, there is virtually no incentive whatsoever to be engaged in any way.
be good ways to incentivize more user participation?
One method very popular among “free market” thinkers is money. I would not rule this method out completely (see, e.g. this question about “paid content”), but there are some indications that money does not function well as incentive (or as motivator) for creative tasks. Also, money seems to have a way of dehumanizing activity and I find such dehumanization might be counter-productive when it comes to promoting participation, social cohesion and / or community engagement, etc.
My proposal to link together the WordPress community has by and large fallen on deaf ears. Apparently, just as very few people are motivated to actively engage with WordPress in general, so also very few people seem to care very much about the wider WordPress community. One visualiation might be to imagine someone like Carl Sagan describe the WordPress project as millions and millions (perhaps even as “billions and billions”) of isolated islands in a huge ocean (the Internet), not really connected in any way other than a common technology (much like a multitude of homes and other buildings built with similar [standardized] hammers, nails, etc.).
In order to
promote collaboration among these individual buildings, isolated islands or
self-oriented websites, the potential participants seem to need a clear
indication of “what’s in it for me?”
I continue to believe that improvements in the functionality of the WordPress search engine’s capabilities could provide very significant benefits to all WordPress users. Likewise, functionalities to promote more efficient and more effective business networking capability among WordPress users ought to benefit every single WordPress user significantly. Indeed: such very powerful and very positive network effects seem obvious to me – I wonder why they do not seem as obvious to (or even to just so much as mildly resonate with) other members of the WordPress community. My hunch is that the vast majority of the WordPress developers believe that widespread adoption is unlikely. In fact, I wouldn’t even rule out that such a collaborative effort might even be unwanted, because developers might fear that such network effects might lead to a reduction in demand for their own lucrative customization services.